← Back to digest
HN Threads

Two words sharply reduced unsupported claims in one small test

What's this about?

An author ran 30 website-analysis prompts and found that adding “Do not guess” reduced fabricated or unsupported claims from 71% to 20%.

What exactly is a prompt-level guardrail?

It is an instruction that steers model behaviour without changing the underlying model. Like a warning sign, it can improve conduct but cannot guarantee compliance or detect every mistake.

What's the community saying?

HN 26 points, 5 comments at selection time.
  1. Several readers report similar success with explicit “only grounded results” language.
  2. Skeptics call it a temporary incantation that benchmark-aware harnesses will absorb.
  3. Even the improved result fails one time in five, reinforcing the need for programmatic verification.
← Calling agents “rogue” may let operators evade responsibilityOpenRouter says model distribution—and token fraud—are becoming infrastructure problems →