← Back to digest
Discussion & Commentary

"Yes, they can tell you used AI"

What's this about?

Mollick's note to anyone submitting an application or paper where one person reads many submissions: it is obvious in most cases, even when the language has been changed, because the ideas and concepts start to rhyme as you read through a stack.

What exactly is the detection mechanism?

Not stylistic tells in any single document — those can be edited away. It is convergence across documents. Ask a model the same kind of question a hundred times and it reaches for the same framings, the same examples, the same three-part structures. A reader seeing one submission notices nothing; a reader seeing two hundred notices they are reading the same essay repeatedly.

What's the community saying?

502 likes
  1. Corroboration from people who read admissions files, grant applications and journal submissions in volume.
  2. The link readers drew to the AI-blindness essay above: same phenomenon at different scales — sameness within one document versus across many.
  3. A practical implication for the "how much of HN is AI" analysis — human readers detect at the population level, which is exactly where detectors work best too.
← The case against ELI5 as a defaultNapkin math on data-centre bans →