← Back to digest
HN Threads

"We never use AI. For anything."

What's this about?

A small Mac software shop published an explicit public stance that they use no AI anywhere in their product or process, positioning it as a selling point rather than a limitation.

What exactly is an "AI stance"?

It has become a category of public statement — a company declaring where AI is and is not used in what it sells. Some publish them to reassure customers about data handling; this one publishes it as differentiation, betting that a segment of buyers now actively prefers human-made software.

What's the community saying?

HN 83 points, 98 comments
  1. Support from people who say they would now actively choose such a product, treating it as a quality signal.
  2. Scepticism that the position is sustainable or fully honest, given how deeply these tools are embedded in ordinary development toolchains.
  3. Debate over whether this is principle or marketing, with several arguing it can be both.
← OpenAI restores 5-hour Codex and Work limits for ChatGPT PlusEchoWM: open, enterable omnimodal world models →